The LA Times broke the story earlier this week that Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a child with a servant (I'm sorry, I meant "domestic worker") ten years ago. Firstly, how does this qualify as news? Rich and powerful men have been producing bastards with servants for thousands of years. If Arnold admitted that he had not fathered any children with servants, that would be news.
Secondly, the reaction from feminists and women in general is pretty amusing and revealing. Amanda Marcotte, whom I bashed a few days ago, typed up one of her typical acidic diatribes, complaining about how men in power objectify women and use them for sex. Jos at Feministing claims that his dalliance is in line with the rest of his sexist behavior. His previous sexist behavior according to her includes "sexually harassing" women at Rio's Carnival (check out the video she linked to and you will find that "sexual harassment" is the feminist term for "flirting with a girl"). Schwarzenegger's wife herself was a feminist gender warrior who reaped what she sowed. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Various alt-right bloggers have suggested that feminism is essentially a massive shit test. The feminist reaction to Schwarzenegger's adultery supports this. The liberal betas and pro-feminist manginas who worship women on a pedestal, never offend them, white knight for them, and nod their heads in agreement with feminist shews like puppies begging for a treat aren't spreading their genes across the world. The men whom feminists despise are. That should tell you something about what women really want when free of any societal constraints on their sexuality.